ONV PD3401G PoE Splitter Teardown & Review

Continuing my PoE series, I bought the ONV PD3401G, an active PoE splitter that is capable of extracting up to 60W (24V @ 2.5A) from the PSE. It is housed in a small aluminum extruded case that can be DIN rail mounted. This splitter is comparatively low-cost, about US$35, and more importantly, is capable of passing through Gigabit.

ONV seems to be quite a reputable company, so I believe their products shouldn’t be too badly designed. This unit can also be easily purchased on Aliexpress without having to go through some obscure distributor.

ONV PoE splitter, side view

ONV PoE splitter, front view

Internally it uses the LT4275A (marking LTGBT) for PD interfacing. The A variant of this chip supports up to 90W of power. On the power supply side, it uses a NCP1034 synchronous buck converter. The NCP1034 is capable of handling up to 100V, which is more than sufficient for PoE.

Looking inside, the in/out Ethernet ports are connected via a transformer, in order extract power from the center taps of each pair. We can see that the PCB traces for the input port pairs are thicker to carry the higher currents. Large beefy diodes form rectifier bridges for the data pairs.

PCB, top side

Surrounding the input port on the underside, there are a lot of unpopulated components; those were supposed to offer input protection, probably using some TVS of some kind. these are marked RD1 ~ RD8, one for each Ethernet wire.

The “POE RUN” LED which indicates PoE power input, is powered by the incoming 48-57V PoE voltage running through a high power resistor. It’s not really ideal, but i think this might also help with loading on the PD side to cope with the minimum power draw.

The 24V/12V LED indicator is also hard-wired, rather than using some fancy comparator circuitry which increases cost. Someone at the factory had to hand-solder either the front panel LED indicator and/or the correct resistor because there’s some flux residue in that area on an otherwise clean board.

The front panel LEDs are also overly bright. If you wish to place this unit somewhere in your living space, you might want to consider covering the LEDs with duct tape or something.

PCB, under side

You can see more photos on the Flickr album here.

PD Interfacing

The designers helpfully included a handy table of resistor values (R7 & R8) for different PD identification signatures. In this case, it identifies as a 90W LTPoE++1 PD.

Table of resistor values, silkscreened on the PCB

The signature output pin (T2P) should have been used to interface with the output regulator for current limiting, in the case where the PSE can only supply lower currents like 13W or 25.5W. This implementation just assumes that the PSE will always be able to provide the high current, or none at all. Drawing too much current will likely cause the PSE to cut power, killing the entire unit and having to restart the PD negotiation again. Sure this works, but It’s just not a good design (if there was any “design” at all).

The unused open-drain outputs are just being pulled-up to Vcc with a 100K resistor.

Power Supply Section

There are various places on the board where the solder mask have been stripped. These allow for solder to be added to the traces to increase current carrying capacity.

MOSFETs used

The NCP1034 uses two N-channel MOSFETs, so in this design both have been chosen to be the same — 60N10 — one of those “jellybean parts”, it seems. The large PCB pads for heat dissipation are not really used. Instead, the high-side MOSFET is just free-standing (“flapping around in the breeze”), and the low-side MOSFET has its own free-standing heatsink. As the case is fully enclosed, there is no airflow within the case, so the heat won’t be efficiently dissipated. They should have designed the MOSFETs to be thermally coupled onto the case for better heat dissipation. According to ONV’s product datasheet, it quotes an MTBF of 190,000 hours (about 21 years).

The output voltage of the regulator is controlled by resistor divider R15 & R16, located on the back side of the board. This model uses 182K and 10K, which gives exactly 24V, when coupled with the internal reference of 1.25V. There is also a 12V output variant of this PoE splitter, which presumably uses different resistor values for the divider.

The NCP1034 has a SS/SD (soft start / shutdown) pin, but that’s just tied to a capacitor to provide for soft-start. The NCP1034 does have a few UVLO circuits that prevent the MOSFETs from operating outside some predetermined conditions, so they are just relying on that.

Everything else is pretty textbook.

Output Voltage Mod

As I have mentioned in my PoE Quick Guide, trying to get PoE splitters in non-standard output voltages is quite difficult (and that translates to being expensive).

Since this splitter is based on the NCP1034, we can adjust the output voltage ourselves with help from the datasheet.

The output voltage is given by Vref * (1 + R1/R2), so if you use the current resistor values R1=182K and R2=10K, we get 24V exactly, less tolerances. To change the output voltage, we need to adjust the values of these resistors accordingly. However, this resistive divider ties in with the compensation circuit.

The compensation circuit used here is of the “Type III (PID)” kind. Their values are dependent on R15 (R1 in the datasheet) because they are placed in parallel. If you wish to alter the output voltage, it is therefore recommended to change only R16 (referred to as R2) because compensation only depends on R1. Due to these constraints, you might not get the accurate output voltage you want, but at least you won’t have to re-calculate the compensation network values.

I attempted to work out the values to make sure the compensation equations were still valid, but either the values I measured in-situ were wrong, or the values didn’t really conform to the equations in the first place. Here they are anyway, for your convenience:

measured values for the compensation circuit

Anyway, if we wanted a 18V output, we calculate for a new R2 value like so:

R2 = Vref / (Vout - Vref) * R1
   = 13.582...

The closest valued resistor I could buy is either a 13.3 or 13.7K; with these, you either get ~17.85V or ~18.35V. To get closer to 18V, I decided to get use 13.5K, which could be achieved by stacking two 27K resistors in parallel, yielding an output of ~18.102V.

Output voltage of 18V after modifications

Using a small DC load tester, the output voltage seems to be maintained when approaching a 2W current draw, although I don’t know about the ripple.

I don’t have any proper equipment to test higher currents for a sustained period, but I will report back if there are any developments on this unit.


The splitter caused no problems with the Gigabit speed, so I assume it’s properly designed — the traces are of matched length, and the transformer parameters were correctly chosen.

The unit is compact, relatively low-cost and works as expected. As an added bonus, you now have the means to modify the output voltage of this splitter easily.

Overall the implementation is passable, with a few things that could be improved. Here are some drawbacks I found from evaluating the design:

  • Blindingly bright LED indicators. I am clearly not the only one who has an issue with this, @marcan42 recently talked about the appropriate brightness levels for LED indicators as well.

  • Non-isolated supply. Technically PoE splitters should use an isolated DC-DC regulator, since the Ethernet data signals themselves are already isolated. However, if you are connecting to wireless equipment or other equipment that will not connect to more devices physically (electrically), then that should be fine.

  • Possible over-current of PSE supply. Because the power supply section is functionally isolated from the PD controller, it may try to supply more current to the downstream device than the PSE can provide. There should already be current-limiting on the PSE supply, which shouldn’t be a big problem but still, this non-compliant PD behaviour can and should be fixed.

  • Shorter-than-ideal lifespan. Heat always shortens the lifespan of electronics. This device could theoretically last much longer if the MOSFETs had their bodies somehow affixed to the exterior aluminium case for heatsinking. Having the MOSFETs just free-standing inside a closed aluminium case with no airflow just doesn’t help to cool it.

If you did find this review useful or have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment below.

  1. 802.3bt was not yet standardized when this chip came out, so they came up with LTPoE++ as their stop-gap implementation 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.